APPLICATION STATUS:

Back to File Status

Name & Address of Applicant	Sri. Sunilkumar.S, Sreelekshmi, Reghunathapuram, Varkala P.O., Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala -695141. Ph: 0470-2600133, Mob: 9349426341, E-mail: sanjay.boss07@gmail.com
Details of the Project	Environmental clearance for the quarry project in Survey Nos. 283/4-2-1-1 pt., 284/3 pt., 284/4 pt., 284/3-2pt., 284/4-2 pt., 284/5-3, 285/3-2 pt., 285/4-2 pt., 285/5-1pt., 285/5-2 pt., 285/6-2, 285/10-1 pt., 285/11 pt., 387/1-1pt., 387/1-2 pt., Chitara Village & Panchayat, Kottarakkara Taluk, Kollam District, Kerala for M/s Masonry Stone Mine (Quarry) project of Mr. Sunil Kumar S.
File Status	E.C Issued
Date of Receipt	30-06-2015
EC Issued Date	11-02-2016
Category	Quarry
District	Kollam
SEAC	47th Meeting of SEAC, 118, 121
SEIAA	48th, 110
Reason for Pendency
Remarks	The 118th SEAC considered the proposal for revalidation as per the Judgment dated.02.11.2020 in WP(C) No.17533/2020 and 23 other cases. The Proponent and Consultant were present. the consultant made the presentation, The Committee directed the Proponent to submit certain additional documents. The 121st SEAC, based on the report of non-compliance of EC conditions from the RO, MoEF&CC dt 6-4-2021, the Committee decided to recommend the rejection of the proposal & SEIAA is requested to cancel the EC issued earlier for noncompliance of EC conditions. 110th SEIAA perused the relevant documents and decided the following Direct the Project Proponent to produce a Certificate of Compliance Report from MoEF&CC, Integrated Regional Office, Bangalore. After the receipt of the same SEAC may conduct a field inspection to confirm whether the Project Proponent has complied with the non-compliances noticed by MoEF&CC, Integrated Regional Office, Bangalore. If the SEAC is convinced that the Project Proponent has attended all the observations made by MoEF&CC, Integrated Regional Office, Bangalore and the EC can be extended, SEAC may estimate the Project life as directed by H’ble High court of Kerala in the common judgment of Hon’ble High Court inEC revalidation cases and recommend the same to SEIAA. Proponent shall stop all further quarry operations till the above the direction of SEIAA are complied with.

L

A D I N G